This requirement, the researchers chose that software because

  This chapter presents the interpretationand the analysis of the gathered data in the survey for the GESEM: Gate EntrySystem of Employees in Southern Luzon State University. The data have beengathered due to the process of acceptability and computation of the results ofthe conducted survey. The generated data are presented in the following tablesfor easy understanding where each table is followed by an analysis andinterpretation.  Figure 4: Design of the Gate EntrySystem of Employees in Southern Luzon State University                      Figure4 shows the researcher’s design what the users will see at the monitor wheneverthey will enter the university. In the design of the background image, colors,researchers considered the simplicity and brightness of the selected colors andfont for the user’s convenience.

  Figure 5: Designof the Admin Dashboard                    Figure 5 shows the researcher’s designthat the HRIS will handle and monitor. The fonts, background colors areconsidered simple and easy to read.    Figure 6: Designof the Registration          Figure 6 shows that this dialog box willpop up whenever the RFID card is not yet registered. The dialog box has a goodfont that the user will read it with ease.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

                   Table 2SoftwareDevelopment Tools of the Gate Entry System of Employees in Southern Luzon StateUniversity Hardware Software ·          Laptop or Desktop Computer ·          RFID reader ·           Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) ·           HyperText Markup Language (HTML) ·           JAVA ·           Javascript with Ajax ·           MySQL ·           phpMyAdmin              Table2 shows the tools that were needed to construct the Gate Entry System ofEmployees in Southern Luzon State University. In terms of hardware requirement,the desktop or laptop needs to have a 32-bit Dual Core 2.0 GHz or higherprocessor. In software requirement, the researchers chose that software becausethe researchers think that it is the most convenient way to make the system.

They use CSS, HTML, JAVA, Javascript wih Ajax for developing the layout,functions, and features of the webpage. MySQL and phpMyAdmin is used for thedatabase of the system.    Table 3Level ofAcceptability of the GESEM: Gate Entry System of Employees in Southern LuzonState University Based on the Employees Perception in terms of Graphical UserInterface (GUI) Statement WM QD The interface of the system is simple and informative. 3.82 HA System font is readable. 3.

87 HA The background color and design is convenient. 3.72 HA Menus are organized. 3.75 HA The features of the system can be easily identified. 3.

77 HA AVERAGE WEIGhTED MEAN 3.78 HA              Table3 shows the level of acceptability in terms of the Graphical User Interface(GUI). The interface shows that its weighted mean is 3.82. The system’s fonthas WM=3.87.

The background color and the design has WM=3.72. Menus beingorganized has WM=3.75. Identification of the features has WM=3.77.             Overall,the total computed Average Weighted Mean (AWM) = 3.

78 which means that theGraphical User Interface (GUI) of the system is HIGHLY ACCEPTABLE.            Thomas Abrahamsson (2003)stated that a graphical user interface was fornavigating among selectable options presented on a display screen. A scrollablemenu including a series of panels.Table 4Level ofAcceptability of the GESEM: Gate Entry System of Employees in Southern LuzonState University Based on the Employees Perception in terms of Functionality Statement WM QD The system can register, identify and record data of the employees. 3.9 HA The system can provide a PDF file of summary of the hours work.

3.82 HA The system provides reminders of the users and birthdays greetings for employees. 3.92 HA The system can register and identify students. 3.82 HA The system can show filter data through table. 3.77 HA AVERAGE WEIGHTED MEAN 3.

84 HA  Table 4 shows the level of acceptabilityin terms of the Functionality. The registration, identification, and recordingof data has WM=3.9. Having a PDF file has WM=3.82. Having reminders andbirthday greetings for the employees has WM=3.

92. Registration and identificationof students has WM=3.82. Filtering the data through table has WM=3.77.             Overall,the total computed Average Weighted Mean (AWM) = 3.

84 which means that the Functionalityof the system is HIGHLY ACCEPTABLE.FranciscaLosavio and Ledis Chirinos (2003) stated that functionality is the ability ofthe software to provide functions which meet stated and indicated needs whenthe software is used under specified conditions, it’s what the software does tofulfil needs.  Table 5Level of Acceptabilityof the GESEM: Gate Entry System of Employees in Southern Luzon State UniversityBased on the Employees Perception in terms of Reliability  Statement WM QD The system has a good quality in performing its actions.

3.77 HA It provides valid information to user. 3.87 HA The system is operational and accessible for the users. 3.87 HA It is free of failure and interruptions. 3.

77 HA The system can recover easily and instantly on user mistakes. 3.8 HA AVERAGE WEIGHTED MEAN 3.81 HA  Table 5 shows the level of acceptabilityin terms of the Reliability. Having a good quality in performing its action hasWM=3.77. Providing valid information to user has WM=3.

87. Being operational andaccessible for the users has WM=3.87. Free of failure and interruptions has WM=3.77.Can recover easily and instantly on users mistakes has WM=3.8.

            Overall,the total computed Average Weighted Mean (AWM) = 3.81 which means that theReliability of the system is HIGHLY ACCEPTABLE.            Joppe(2000) defines reliability as the extent to which results are consistent overtime and an accurate representation of the total population under study isreferred to as reliability and if the results of a study can be reproducedunder a similar methodology, then the research instrument is considered to bereliable as cited by Nahid Golafshani in his Understanding Reliability andValidity in Qualitative Research 2003.

  Table 6Level ofAcceptability of the GESEM: Gate Entry System of Employees in Southern LuzonState University Based on the Employees Perception in terms of Usability Statement WM QD The system is manageable. 3.77 HA The system can be used even the user doesn’t have technical expertise.

3.77 HA The system is user friendly and can be learned easily. 3.72 HA Function of the system can be easily determined by the user. 3.72 HA The system can be clicked and navigated with ease by the user. 3.77 HA AVERAGE WIEGHTED MEAN 3.

75 HA  Table 6 shows the level of acceptabilityin terms of the Usability. The system being manageable has WM=3.77. Technicalexpertise is not a requirement has WM=3.77. User friendly has WM=3.72. Thesystem can easily determine has WM=3.

72. It can be clicked and navigated withease has WM=3.77.             Overall,the total computed Average Weighted Mean (AWM) = 3.75 which means that theUsability of the system is HIGHLY ACCEPTABLE.            JakobNielsen (2012) said that usability defined as a quality attribute that assesseshow easy user interfaces are to use and determine by five components, learnability,efficiency, memorability, errors and satisfaction.

 Table 7Level ofAcceptability of the GESEM: Gate Entry System of Employees in Southern LuzonState University Based on the Employees Perception in terms of Efficiency Statement WM QD The system responds to the user commands instantly. 3.82 HA The system is time and cost saving in completing task than traditional process.

3.87 HA The system can show desired results quickly. 3.

85 HA The system is simple and easy to use. 3.85 HA The system is efficiently capable of performing many functions in a minute. 3.82 HA AVERAGE WEIGHTED MEAN 3.

84 HA  Table 7 shows the level of acceptabilityin terms of the Efficiency. It responds to the users has WM=3.82. It is timeand cost saving in completing task has WM=3.87.

Show desired results hasWM=3.85. It is simple and easy to use has WM=3.85.

Has the capability toperform many functions in a minute has WM=3.82.             Overall,the total computed Average Weighted Mean (AWM) = 3.

84 which means that the Efficiencyof the system is HIGHLY ACCEPTABLE.            FranciscaLosavio and Ledis Chirinos (2003) said that efficiency isthe ability of the software product to provide appropriate performance,relative to the amount of resources used, under stated conditions.  Table 8Level ofAcceptability of the GESEM: Gate Entry System of Employees in Southern LuzonState University Based on the Employees Perception Parameters WM QD Graphical User Interface (GUI) 3.78 HA Functionality 3.84 HA Reliability 3.81 HA Usability 3.75 HA Efficiency 3.84 HA  Table 8 shows that the system ismanageable of the user’s standard in terms of the GUI, Functionality,Reliability, Usability, and Efficiency.

  Table 9Level ofAcceptability of the GESEM: Gate Entry System of Employees in Southern LuzonState University Based on the IT Experts and Professors Perception in terms ofFunctional Suitability Statement WM QD The system can perform certain task: register and identify users. 3.9 HA The system can show filters and data for users. 3.6 HA The system can perform certain features: post announcements and birthday greetings. 3.8 HA AVERAGE WEIGHTED MEAN 3.

76 HA  Table 9 shows the level of acceptabilityin terms of the Functional Suitability. It performs certain task has WM=3.9.

Itcan filter and show data for user has WM=3.6. It can perform certain featurehas WM=3.8.             Overall,the total computed Average Weighted Mean (AWM) = 3.76 which means that the FunctionalSuitability of the system is HIGHLY ACCEPTABLE.

            Accordingto Rodriquez, M. et al. (2016), functional suitability is the degree which measureif the system provides functions that meet all the stated or implicit needswhen used under specific conditions.   Table 10Level ofAcceptability of the GESEM: Gate Entry System of Employees in Southern LuzonState University Based on the IT Experts and Professors Perception in terms ofPerformance Efficiency Statement WM QD The system responds quickly to every command of the user. 3.6 HA The data of the system loads quickly. 3.

7 HA The system can perform a lot of functions without consuming too much time. 3.8 HA AVERAGE WEIGHTED MEAN 3.

7 HA  Table 10 shows the level ofacceptability in terms of the Performance Efficiency. It responds quickly hasWM=3.6. It can load the data quickly has WM=3.7. It can perform many functionswithout consuming too much time has WM=3.7.             Overall,the total computed Average Weighted Mean (AWM) = 3.

7 which means that thePerformance Efficiency of the system is HIGHLY ACCEPTABLE.            Accordingto Losavio, F. et al. (2003), performance efficiency is the capability of thesoftware product to provide appropriate performance, relative to the amount ofresources used, under stated conditions.       Table 11Level ofAcceptability of the GESEM: Gate Entry System of Employees in Southern LuzonState University Based on the IT Experts and Professors Perception in terms ofCompatibility Statement WM QD The system can be used on desktop or laptop, 32 bit Dual Core 2.0 GHz or higher processor 3.

8 HA The system runs on different types of web browsers such as Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, and Opera. 3.8 HA The system can be used simultaneously in different desktops. 3.7 HA AVERAGE WEIGHTED MEAN 3.8 HA  Table 11 shows the level ofacceptability in terms of the Compatibility. It can be use either laptop ordesktop has WM=3.8.

It runs on different types of browsers has WM=3.8. It canbe used simultaneously in different desktops has WM=3.7.

            Overall,the total computed Average Weighted Mean (AWM) = 3.8 which means that theCompatibility of the system is HIGHLY ACCEPTABLE.            As Dorneo, D. etal (2016) cited, compatibility is the power of two or more software componentsto exchange information or to perform their required functions while sharingthe same hardware or software.   Table 12Level ofAcceptability of the GESEM: Gate Entry System of Employees in Southern LuzonState University Based on the IT Experts and Professors Perception in terms ofUsability Statement WM        QD The system is easy to navigate and operate. 3.8 HA The system outputs can be analysed and learned easily.

3.9 HA The system features and its uses can easily identified. 3.8 HA AVERAGE WEIGHTED MEAN 3.

8 HA  Table 12 shows the level ofacceptability in terms of the Usability. It can navigate and operate with easehas WM=3.8. The outputs can be analysed and learned easily has WM=3.9. Thefeatures and the uses can be identified easily has WM=3.

8.             Overall,the total computed Average Weighted Mean (AWM) = 3.8 which means that the Usabilityof the system is HIGHLY ACCEPTABLE.            MaximilianSpeicher (2015) said that this characteristic is the extent to which a productcan be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness,efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use.   Table 13Level ofAcceptability of the GESEM: Gate Entry System of Employees in Southern LuzonState University Based on the IT Experts and Professors Perception in terms ofReliability Statement WM QD The system is operational and available when require for use. 3.

9 HA The system provides liable information. 3.9 HA The system is free from bugs and interruption. 3.8 HA AVERAGE WEIGHTED MEAN 3.8 HA  Table 13 shows the level ofacceptability in terms of the Reliability. It is operational and available hasWM=3.9.

It provides liable information has WM=3.9. It is free from bugs andinterruptions has WM=3.

8.             Overall,the total computed Average Weighted Mean (AWM) = 3.8 which means that theReliability of the system is HIGHLY ACCEPTABLE.            According toLosavio F. et al. (2003), the capability of the software product to maintainits level of performance under stated conditions for a stated period of time.    Table 14Level ofAcceptability of the GESEM: Gate Entry System of Employees in Southern LuzonState University Based on the IT Experts and Professors Perception in terms ofSecurity Statement WM QD The data of the system is not editable by users. 3.

9 HA Only the admin can delete, edit and register data in the system. 3.9 HA The system prevents persons without an ID in entering the university.

3.6 HA AVERAGE WEIGHTED MEAN 3.8 HA  Table 14 shows the level ofacceptability in terms of the Security. The data is not editable has WM=3.9.Only the admin has the authority to edit, delete, and register data has WM=3.

9.It prevent persons entering the school without and ID has WM=3.6.             Overall,the total computed Average Weighted Mean (AWM) = 3.8 which means that the Securityof the system is HIGHLY ACCEPTABLE.            The degree towhich a product or system protects information and data so that persons orother products or systems have the degree of data access appropriate to theirtypes and levels of authorization according to Van der Veer, R.

(2015).  Table 15Level ofAcceptability of the GESEM: Gate Entry System of Employees in Southern LuzonState University Based on the IT Experts and Professors Perception in terms ofMaintainability Statement WM QD The system can be easily diagnosed for deficiencies and failures. 3.5 HA The system enables specified modification to be implemented. 3.

8 HA The system can avoid unexpected effect from modifications. 3.7 HA AVERAGE WEIGHTED MEAN 3.6 HA                 Table 15 shows the level ofacceptability in terms of the Maintainability. It can diagnose for deficienciesand failures with ease has WM=3.5. It enables specified modification easily hasWM=3.8.

It can avoid unexpected effect from modifications has WM=3.8.             Overall,the total computed Average Weighted Mean (AWM) = 3.6 which means that theMaintainability of the system is HIGHLY ACCEPTABLE.            Miguel,J. et al (2014) refers to the level to which the software product can bemodified. Modifications may include corrections, improvements or adaptation ofthe software to changes in environment, and in requirements and functionalspecifications.

  Table 16Level ofAcceptability of the GESEM: Gate Entry System of Employees in Southern LuzonState University Based on the IT Experts and Professors Perception in terms ofPortability Statement WM QD Admin can add and update data to other computer by signing in the account in the system. 3.8 HA Data of the system can easily provide hard copy. 3.9 HA The system can be access with ease. 3.8 HA AVERAGE WEIGHTED MEAN 3.

8 HA  Table 16 shows the level ofacceptability in terms of the Portability. Only admin can sign in the accounthas WM=3.8. It provides hard copy of the data has WM=3.9. It can be accesseasily has WM=3.8.

            Overall,the total computed Average Weighted Mean (AWM) = 3.8 which means that the Portabilityof the system is HIGHLY ACCEPTABLE.Accordingto Groven, A. et al (2005), the ability to transfer the software from oneenvironment to another. Miguel, J. et al (2014) refers to the ease with which asystem or component can be transferred from one environment to another.    Table 17Level ofAcceptability of the GESEM: Gate Entry System of Employees in Southern LuzonState University Based on the IT Experts and Professors Perception Parameter WM QD Functional Suitability 3.76 HA Performance Efficiency 3.

7 HA Compatibility 3.8 HA Usability 3.8 HA Reliability 3.8 HA Security 3.8 HA Maintainability 3.6 HA Portability 3.

8 HA  Table 17 shows that the system ismanageable of the expert’s standard in terms of the Functional Suitability,Performance Efficiency. Compatibility, Usability, Reliability, Security,Maintainability, Portability.

x

Hi!
I'm Mary!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out