R.Gopali, and motivation is also positive and the

R.Gopali, Rima Ghose Chowdhury (2014).Leadership Styles and Employee Motivation: An Empirical Investigation in aLeading Oil Company in India.

IMPACT:International Journal of Research in Business Management (IMPACT: IJRBM)ISSN(E): 2321-886X; ISSN(P): 2347-4572 Vol. 2.The study explores how at the western region of a leading oil and refineryCompany, leadership styles (the independent variable) influence employeemotivation (the dependent variable). Data of both types, primary and secondary,have been used for the study. Secondary data has been collected throughpublished data in public domain. For primary data, using random sampling, 75questionnaires were distributed, out of which 50 were completed. Thequestionnaire contains different elements drawn from a) The Full RangeLeadership Development Model, developed by Bass and Avolio (1994) and b) WorkMotivation Scale.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The instrument employs 29 questions on Leadership style and10 questions on Motivation, on a 5-point and 7-point scale respectively. Thesurvey was administered between Jan and March 2014. The researcher found thatthe dominant leadership styles were transformational and transactional andemployees were moderately motivated. The results show that different leadershipstyle factors will have different impacts on employee motivation components.Co-relation between Transformational Leadership styles and employee motivationis positive and the score is 0.602. Co-relation between transactional style andmotivation is also positive and the score is 0.

329. However, the degree ofco-relation is less, which means that, transformational style of leadershipmotivates employees more than transactional style. Laissez-fairre style, on theother hand, has a negative co-relation with motivation. This means thatemployees are not satisfied. All the co-relations are highly significant.

Liridon Veliu, MimozaManxhari, Visar Demiri, Liridon Jahaj (2017). The Influence of LeadershipStyles on Employee’s Performance. Journalof Management ?2 (31).Thisstudy investigates the employees performance at Business Organizations inKosovo due to effect of different leadership styles. The impact of autocratic;bureaucratic; charismatic; democratic; laissez-faire; transformational andtransactional leadership styles on employee performance at BusinessOrganizations in Kosovo is determined. The role of leaders in today’s organizationshas changed and the success of any organization relies on the leadership stylespracticed by the leaders. A good leader understands the importance of employeesin achieving the goals of the organization, and that motivating the employeesis of paramount importance in achieving these goals.

Different leadershipstyles bring about different consequences, which have direct or indirect impacton the attitude and behaviors of the employees. The findings of this studyindicated that democratic, autocratic and transformational leadership stylespositively impacted the level of employee performance.  The results of the correlation analysesrevealed that charismatic, bureaucratic, laissez-faire and transactional leadershipstyle has a negative impact on the level of employee performance butstatistically it is not significant. Each leadership style is a combination ofdifferent types of behavior and characteristics of leaders. If there is theneed to make a decision quickly and take urgent action, a leader should rely onthe autocratic style. If the group is undisciplined and poorly organized, theautocratic style is more efficient. The democratic leadership style matcheswith a well-organized and stable group.

In the longer term, the democraticstyle of leadership, which includes giving employees a certain freedom andinvolving them in decision-making, is more productive.  The transformational leadership style matcheswith attempts to induce followers to reorder their needs by transcendingself-interests and strive for higher order needs. The result clearly indicatesthat transformational leadership is correlated with employee performance. Theseresults also informed that employee performance is heavily relying onleadership and it can play a vital role in determining the performance ofemployees, so managers must carefully analyze, what kind of leadership theyshould adopt if they to want to increase employee performance.Iqbal, Anwar, Haider (2015). Effect of LeadershipStyle on Employee Performance. Arabian Journal of Business and ManagementReview .

The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of the differentleadership styles (autocratic, democratic, and participative) on the employees’performance. The autocratic style is characterized by an “I tell” philosophy. Thedemocratic approach is characterized by an “I share” philosophy. Participativeleadership style is that involves all members of a team in identifyingessential goals and developing procedures or strategies for reach those goals. Oneof the main benefits of participative leadership is that the process allows forthe development of the additional leaders who can serve the organization at alater date. As elaborate by Myron Rush and Cole the participative style ofleadership has a greater positive effect on employee performance in whichsituation employee feel power and confidence in doing their job and in makingdifferent decisions. And in autocratic style leaders only have the authority totake decisions in which employees’ feels inferior in doing jobs and decisions.

In democratic style employee have to some extent discretionary power to do workso their performance is better than in autocratic style. Theauthoritative style is appropriate when new employees are unfamiliar and don’thave sufficient know how about their jobs. The consultative style isappropriate when organization needs creative problem solving. The participativestyle is appropriate when organization have competent and talented team members.The democratic leadership style in Al-Ghazi tractor factory would further empowertheir employees by developing teams and according some measure of power andauthority to their employees. The Al-Ghazi tractor factory would immediatereduces the autocratic leadership practices.

Hence, Al-Ghazi tractor factorywould advocate for the better leadership styles that suites differentsituations so as to reduce the dominance of autocratic leadership unless insituations where it is necessary.Somaye Bahmanabad. ACase Study of the Impact of Leadership Styles on Bank Employees’ JobSatisfaction. Södertörn university, The Institute of SocialSciences, Bachelor Thesis 15 hp.Leadershipaffects the organization effectiveness in a numerous amount of ways. Due tocircumstances there are a number of changes that take place in leadership.

Leadershipis the powring force that governs the functioning of the employees; especiallyin the banking sector.  Questionnaire inthe form of survey was used to collect the data. The data was tested using theStructural Equation Modeling (SEM) Method using Lisrel software. The impact ofusing transformational, relation-oriented and transactional leadership stylesand their direct effect on job Satisfaction. A total of one hundredquestionnaires were distributed among SEB and Swede bank´s employees andseventy-one fully answered questionnaires were used for statistical analysis.In other words, seventy-one percent of the questionnaires were returned.

  The results clearly show that leadershipstyle (Relation-oriented, Transactional, and Transformational) have asignificantly positive effect on both the employer and employee’s satisfactionwith the job.  The results indicate thatthe Transformational approach ads the most contribution toward job satisfactioncompared to the Transactional and Relation-oriented styles of leadership. Thereis a significant relationship between the transactional leadership and jobsatisfaction. There is a significant relationship between the relati on-orientedleadership and job satisfaction.

x

Hi!
I'm Mary!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out