late forms of implementations and thereby different forms

late capitalism” characterized by the ethnicization of social conflicts and class-relations, and
ethnification of enmities as well as of ethnicification of workers and



We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

       There is
a national order. The appearance of
nation in history is to be explained by the sequences of socio-economic and
socio-cultural homogenization. Constituting the union, the processes of
national unification by language, habits and customs, and common regulations
include the forms of implementations and thereby different forms of coercion.
The genesis of nation is rightly associated with constitutive violences later
condemned to the oblivion and suppression in order to stabilize the national
reproduction and survival. Therefore, the existence of nation is always a
constellation of remembering and oblivion, e. g. the remembering of the heroic
past and the oblivion of the violence of the beginning. The nation is
frequently depicted as the form of voluntary association, but the real
situation is much more complicated, because the institutions of nation and
national citizenship comprise the contradictory set of impositions and
voluntariness, ascribed norms and voluntarily accepted duties and
responsibilities. The
nationalization of the societyp1  must enact biopolitics that governs the human life,
that is, controls the sequences of birth and death, and orientates the
processes of normalization. The self-definition and self-understanding of the
individual subject refers to the national order.

      The nation is not a neutral entity on the
historical scene but the politico-economic bearer of the interest and frame of
complex relationship between collective and private interests. The nation, or
the subjects that act in its name, must triumph against the asymmetrical power
of absolutist states, and practice egalitarianism amongst its members endorsing
its democratic horizon. The nationalized subjects affirm the caesura in
relation to the past, there is no simple non-reflective continuity between the
past and contemporaneity, that is, the nation institutionalizes the tradition
as the mediated experience of the past. At the same time, these subjects must
subordinate the newly emerging minorities that feel as endangered by the
national construction and claim for the special treatment in new state exposing
to the charge of non-loyaltyp2 . The tendencies imposed by the intention of
nationalization of a given territory indicate a lot of conflictsS3  such as the sharpened competition in acquiring
and monopolization of the resources. Michael Walzer in his endeavour describes
the national-state as a specific regime of

 p1Ovo je
neuobi?ajena sintagma, npr. nationalization of a society ili sli?no bi bilo
leksi?ki prikladnije. u redu

re?enica, može npr. ovako, ali opet fraza na kraju exposing
to the charge of illoyality ostaje nejasna.

 Predlazemo da bude ovako

At the same time, these subjects must
subordinate the emerging minorities that feel endangered by the exclusive national

 S3Moze li se
ovde pojasniti, ilustrovati na sta se misli? Tipa: …conflicts, such as…


I'm Mary!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out