Despite Japan. After the 1986 ban, Japan

Despite the whaling ban in 1986 by the International Whaling Commission, some countries are refusing to stop doing this practice especially Japan. After the 1986 ban, Japan launched their supposed scientific whaling program which is widely known as their cover for their commercial whaling practice. Supporters of the whaling ban claim that reversing the ban will cause whale populations to become endangered or even extinct. Also, supporters of the IWC whaling ban say that the IWC should maintain the ban and establish stricter rules regarding the ban.

Proponents also claim that the whale populations have yet to return to its former population before the excessive hunting happened. “Anti-whaling groups such as Greenpeace point to species such as the West Pacific gray whale, of which, according to some estimates, there are only about 100 left. According to Palumbi and Roman’s whale population study, the North Atlantic humpback whale population before commercial whaling was more than 20 times what it is now.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

( )” Even with IWC whaling ban Japan, Iceland, and Norway continue to hunt illegally.Additionally, supporters of ban suggest that it is completely idiotic to risk lifting the ban for countries who claim that whaling is a part of their culture. And that banning whaling, a practice that whale hunters were doing for centuries is cultural imperialism and is totally unacceptable.

In response to the accusations of cultural imperialism, advocates of the whaling ban countered the accusations by comparing the modern practice of whaling to the historical practice. The modern hunting of whale includes the use of modern army technology by using harpoons with explosives on them. As much Japan exaggerates the importance it does not hide the amount of demand whale meat has dropped over the past few decades. Also, the demand for whale meat has dramatically decreased so much in Japan to the degree that they feed whale meat to dogs. “The fact that whale meat is already languishing in stockpiles and being used for dog food clearly shows that Japanese people simply are not interested in eating it,” said Metiria Turei, a spokesperson of the New Zealand Green Party.

( )” Plus, advocates also point to reports that Japanese whaling industries are selling whale meat to schools and feeding them to visitors of the country.Supporters of the ban also the point out incidents where whale meat was found to be unhealthy. “ was discovered that Japan deemed whale meat purchased from Norway unfit to eat because it contained up to twice the permitted levels of pesticides, likely due to agricultural runoff or leakage from waste storage containers.(Kirby 1 )” The main reason why whale meat is considered unhealthy to eat is that whales are easily exposed to pollutants in the water which was caused by human pollution.

Also, this shows us that whale meat cannot be considered consumable for humans at all.Opponents of the commercial whaling ban claim that the ban has served its purpose and its no longer needed since the whale populations have rebounded. Whaling countries are willing to go by a sustainable-use plan if the ban goes away. Critics of the ban say that anti-whaling groups completely hide the main reason why the ban was created. In their point of view, the ban was originally made to help whale populations recover and it was temporary. As claimed by JWA (Japan Whaling Association), “No whales have ever been hunted to extinction, nor are they likely to be.

..On the other hand, there are species which are abundant enough that marine management is needed.( )” Opponents of the ban also claim that the ban has allowed some whale populations to overpopulate and it cause many fish populations to drop. In particular, researchers from JWA(Japan Whaling Association) point out the rise in the number of Minke whales, which has affected the growth of the populations of local fish species and other whale species. Critics of the IWC ban argue that taking down the ban and put a sustainable-use plan that can help increase coastal fish populations back up. Plus, it can help fish companies in developing countries that have a hard time catching fish. Opponents of the whaling ban also say that the ban hurts whaling communities in developing countries, and that hunting groups are most likely not going to decrease the whale populations.

They also argue that the over protection of one species can cause the entire ecosystem to be unbalanced. Another reason why opponents are against the ban is that the ban was originally intended to protect whales for future generations. But, the idea of whaling has been manipulated by environmental activists because of their emotional objection to whaling itself. Which to critics was an attitude that most countries did not have when the ban was created.Lastly, opponents of the whaling ban argue that this shows a form of cultural imperialism on areas of the world that have varying values on hunting and whales.

The JWA website states “Attitudes towards animals are apart of national cultures. No nations should try to impose their attitudes on others.( )” Representatives from Japan have compared the whaling ban to telling the British to stop eating fish and chips or telling Americans that they cannot eat hamburgers. They also insist that eating whale meat is a culinary tradition in Japan. Surprisingly some anti-whaling groups agree to lift the ban only if whaling countries follow a set of rules.

Plus, opponents of the whaling ban argue that lifting the ban can help discourage countries from over whaling if there is a revised set of rules to go by. Both sides of the whaling ban provide evidence that supports their case and their point of view on the issue. But, in my honest opinion the whaling ban should not be taken down, instead, the IWC needs to establish stricter laws involving the whaling ban. The fact that whale meat can contain high toxins like mercury and other dangerous toxins and is still being fed to people in Japan is unacceptable. Also, the fact that demand for whale meat in Japan is dropping even proves that this is not a culinary meal in Japan anymore. If this was truly a cultural practice then Japan should not be using military weapons to catch these whales. Instead, they should be doing a cultural way of whaling and should stop lying about whale research.

Finally, the dishonesty of both sides are continuously clouding the debate over the whaling ban is the main reason why both sides cannot come to an agreement and probably will never come to one.


I'm Mary!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out