Death Middle East, north Africa and Asia,such as

Death
Penalty Should Exist

Death
penalty has a long history and it is always seemed as the most severe penalty.
It is easy for death penalty to end the life of a human being, so many people
think it is inhuman. However, there also many people who really don’t want to
abolish it, such as the victim’s family. Nowadays, most of the countries have
abolished the death penalty, countries which haven’t abolished it are mainly
concentrate in the Middle East, north Africa and Asia,such as China, the United
States, Japan and India still retain the death penalty. In recent years, the death penalty has
been aroused people’s attention and the heated discussions towards it are right
on their ways. In my opinion, the death penalty shouldn’t be abolished. d1 The followings are my
reasons:

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

First, the countries can
strengthen its rule over people by the death penalty. The reason is that the
death penalty serves to highlight the state’s power over life and death. For a
regime like Vietnam’s, the swift carrying out of a death sentence, especially
when performed in public, serves to highlight the state’s power over life and
death and enhance political control over the domestic constituency(Daniel 2016). Some countries which are peaceful think they don’t
need the death penalty to govern people and abolish it.

Second,death penalty
cannot be replaced by other punishment. A person should receive death penalty,
when he kill people deliberately. when a person kills people, he does not
receive death penalty, but other punishment, such as life imprisonment. The
life imprisonment is a waste of resource and once the prisoner runs away from
the jail, it is horrible thing to people. While death penalty won’t make that
happen. On 22 July 2011 Anders Behring Breivik
killed eight people by detonating a van bomb amid Regjeringskvartalet in Oslo,
then shot dead 69 participants of a Workers’ Youth League (AUF) summer camp on
the island of Utøya(Lewis & Cowell 2012). On 24 August 2012 Brevity was adjudged sane and sentenced to containment—a
special form of a prison sentence that can be extended indefinitely again and
again—with an approximate time frame of 21 years and a minimum time of 10
years, the maximum penalty in Norway(Andreas 2014). The judgment is unwise
obviously and most of Norwegians want the boy to be sentenced to death. If
people who cause great harm can walk in the street again?it is very frightened.
However the Norwegian law doesn’t have the death penalty. In summary, it is
necessary for country to remain the death penalty to punish people who a great
mistake which isn’t forgiven.

In addition, death penalty
has always been considered the most effective method for the State to crack
down on grave crimes. Death penalty is the most effective deterrence to grave
crimes, which has been the key basis for the State to retain death penalty.
Either in the past or at present, the claimed reasons for preserving death
penalty by nations unexceptionally include this reason(Rider, 1992). The death penalty can
decrease crime rate effectively. Because of the reason, India won’t
abolition the death penalty. Law Commission of India once declared that taking
into account the practical situation of India, the disparities in social
education and levels of morality and education, the country’s vast area and
demographic diversity, and the urgent need to preserve the rule of law and
social order, India could not risk experimenting with abolition of the death
penalty(Daniel 2016). Theories on criminal behavior provide an ambiguous
prediction regard-ing the impact of capital punishment. On the one hand, the
threat of the death penalty may operate to increase the expected costs of
murder and thus reduce incentives to engage in homicidal behavior. On the other
hand, executions may stimulate more homicides by validating the social
acceptability of re-tributive actions (Shepherd, 2005). But we can use some
date to prove that the death penalty can decrease crime rate. According the
research conclusion of professor Ehrlich in 1975 of the relationship between
murder rate and death penalty execution between 1935 and 1969 in the US, The
higher the execution rate, the lower the murder rate; one extra execution of
death penalty in the crime peak season a year might reduce seven to eight
murders on average(Zhang 2009). Conclusion of Professor Stephen
Layson drawn by analyzing murder statistics in the two time periods from 1936
to 1977 and from 1934 to 1986 using Ehrlich’s approach in 1985 was as follows:
there was negative correlation between murder rate and arrest rate, and between
the conviction and the possibility of execution after such conviction, that is,
with the increase of probability of these penalty variables, murder rate
dropped; at the same time, the exchange value of the estimated penalty
variables was as follows: Every execution of death penalty could reduce 8.5 to
28 murders(Zhang 2009). To a certain extent, the date
prove that the death penalty make crime rate be lower.

 d1http://www.tingclass.net/show-9733-358091-1.html

Death
Penalty Should Exist

Death
penalty has a long history and it is always seemed as the most severe penalty.
It is easy for death penalty to end the life of a human being, so many people
think it is inhuman. However, there also many people who really don’t want to
abolish it, such as the victim’s family. Nowadays, most of the countries have
abolished the death penalty, countries which haven’t abolished it are mainly
concentrate in the Middle East, north Africa and Asia,such as China, the United
States, Japan and India still retain the death penalty. In recent years, the death penalty has
been aroused people’s attention and the heated discussions towards it are right
on their ways. In my opinion, the death penalty shouldn’t be abolished. d1 The followings are my
reasons:

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

First, the countries can
strengthen its rule over people by the death penalty. The reason is that the
death penalty serves to highlight the state’s power over life and death. For a
regime like Vietnam’s, the swift carrying out of a death sentence, especially
when performed in public, serves to highlight the state’s power over life and
death and enhance political control over the domestic constituency(Daniel 2016). Some countries which are peaceful think they don’t
need the death penalty to govern people and abolish it.

Second,death penalty
cannot be replaced by other punishment. A person should receive death penalty,
when he kill people deliberately. when a person kills people, he does not
receive death penalty, but other punishment, such as life imprisonment. The
life imprisonment is a waste of resource and once the prisoner runs away from
the jail, it is horrible thing to people. While death penalty won’t make that
happen. On 22 July 2011 Anders Behring Breivik
killed eight people by detonating a van bomb amid Regjeringskvartalet in Oslo,
then shot dead 69 participants of a Workers’ Youth League (AUF) summer camp on
the island of Utøya(Lewis & Cowell 2012). On 24 August 2012 Brevity was adjudged sane and sentenced to containment—a
special form of a prison sentence that can be extended indefinitely again and
again—with an approximate time frame of 21 years and a minimum time of 10
years, the maximum penalty in Norway(Andreas 2014). The judgment is unwise
obviously and most of Norwegians want the boy to be sentenced to death. If
people who cause great harm can walk in the street again?it is very frightened.
However the Norwegian law doesn’t have the death penalty. In summary, it is
necessary for country to remain the death penalty to punish people who a great
mistake which isn’t forgiven.

In addition, death penalty
has always been considered the most effective method for the State to crack
down on grave crimes. Death penalty is the most effective deterrence to grave
crimes, which has been the key basis for the State to retain death penalty.
Either in the past or at present, the claimed reasons for preserving death
penalty by nations unexceptionally include this reason(Rider, 1992). The death penalty can
decrease crime rate effectively. Because of the reason, India won’t
abolition the death penalty. Law Commission of India once declared that taking
into account the practical situation of India, the disparities in social
education and levels of morality and education, the country’s vast area and
demographic diversity, and the urgent need to preserve the rule of law and
social order, India could not risk experimenting with abolition of the death
penalty(Daniel 2016). Theories on criminal behavior provide an ambiguous
prediction regard-ing the impact of capital punishment. On the one hand, the
threat of the death penalty may operate to increase the expected costs of
murder and thus reduce incentives to engage in homicidal behavior. On the other
hand, executions may stimulate more homicides by validating the social
acceptability of re-tributive actions (Shepherd, 2005). But we can use some
date to prove that the death penalty can decrease crime rate. According the
research conclusion of professor Ehrlich in 1975 of the relationship between
murder rate and death penalty execution between 1935 and 1969 in the US, The
higher the execution rate, the lower the murder rate; one extra execution of
death penalty in the crime peak season a year might reduce seven to eight
murders on average(Zhang 2009). Conclusion of Professor Stephen
Layson drawn by analyzing murder statistics in the two time periods from 1936
to 1977 and from 1934 to 1986 using Ehrlich’s approach in 1985 was as follows:
there was negative correlation between murder rate and arrest rate, and between
the conviction and the possibility of execution after such conviction, that is,
with the increase of probability of these penalty variables, murder rate
dropped; at the same time, the exchange value of the estimated penalty
variables was as follows: Every execution of death penalty could reduce 8.5 to
28 murders(Zhang 2009). To a certain extent, the date
prove that the death penalty make crime rate be lower.

 d1http://www.tingclass.net/show-9733-358091-1.html

x

Hi!
I'm Mary!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out