According to the IRAC method

According to the IRAC method,
Issue- The issue in the given case is that a lady named Anne Bakilana Tanzanian origin living in Washington DC, hired a house maid from Tanzania named Sophia Kiwanuka to come and work in the States. After coming to the States Bakilana confiscated Kiwanuka’s passport, held her in isolation and made her work for longer hours where she worked for 7 days a week without any breaks. In addition to that Kiwanuka was threatened of deportation as well. These incidents lead to Kiwanuka allegations of Bakilana causing intentional infliction to emotional distress.
Rule- Intentional infliction to emotional distress.
Analysis- Ms. Kiwanuka alleges that the defendant Ms. Bakilana subjected her to the tort of intentional infliction to emotional distress, the tort of Intentional infliction to emotional stress can be defined as an intentional act the defendant performed causing an emotional distress to the victim. In a reasonable way for the tort to apply it must follow these elements:
1) The defendant must act intentionally- This is observed when Ms. Kiwanuka stated that Ms. Bakilana intentionally interferes in order to ensure that Ms. Kiwanuka doesn’t make any acquaintances. Also Ms. Bakilana admitted that she had “developed a scheme taking advantage of Kiwanuka’s lack of knowledge in bank accounting to get a labor at lower rate than the legal minimum wage rate required”. These intentional acts support the plaintiffs claim.
2) The defendant’s conduct must have been extreme or offensive- Ms. Kiwanuka mentions that Ms. Bakilana once lifted her by her collar while screaming at her, also Ms Kiwanuka mentions that Ms. Bakilana “used her controlling position on Ms. Kiwanuka by involving into an intentional pattern of offensive verbal abuse”.
3) The conduct must be the cause for distress- With the evidences it indicates that these acts could have led to emotional distress. Ms. Kiwanuka mentioned that she had poor skills in English language and allegedly claims saying that Ms. Bakilana being fully aware of this exploited her disability by intentionally mis-transalting information or keeping away some important information regarding the domestic works legal rights. See Leavitt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc, as it discusses a similar case where the defendant did not accommodate with the plaintiff’s disability.

According to the IRAC method,
Issue- The issue in the given case is that a lady named Anne Bakilana Tanzanian origin living in Washington DC, hired a house maid from Tanzania named Sophia Kiwanuka to come and work in the States. After coming to the States Bakilana confiscated Kiwanuka’s passport, held her in isolation and made her work for longer hours where she worked for 7 days a week without any breaks. In addition to that Kiwanuka was threatened of deportation as well. These incidents lead to Kiwanuka allegations of Bakilana causing intentional infliction to emotional distress.
Rule- Intentional infliction to emotional distress.
Analysis- Ms. Kiwanuka alleges that the defendant Ms. Bakilana subjected her to the tort of intentional infliction to emotional distress, the tort of Intentional infliction to emotional stress can be defined as an intentional act the defendant performed causing an emotional distress to the victim. In a reasonable way for the tort to apply it must follow these elements:
1) The defendant must act intentionally- This is observed when Ms. Kiwanuka stated that Ms. Bakilana intentionally interferes in order to ensure that Ms. Kiwanuka doesn’t make any acquaintances. Also Ms. Bakilana admitted that she had “developed a scheme taking advantage of Kiwanuka’s lack of knowledge in bank accounting to get a labor at lower rate than the legal minimum wage rate required”. These intentional acts support the plaintiffs claim.
2) The defendant’s conduct must have been extreme or offensive- Ms. Kiwanuka mentions that Ms. Bakilana once lifted her by her collar while screaming at her, also Ms Kiwanuka mentions that Ms. Bakilana “used her controlling position on Ms. Kiwanuka by involving into an intentional pattern of offensive verbal abuse”.
3) The conduct must be the cause for distress- With the evidences it indicates that these acts could have led to emotional distress. Ms. Kiwanuka mentioned that she had poor skills in English language and allegedly claims saying that Ms. Bakilana being fully aware of this exploited her disability by intentionally mis-transalting information or keeping away some important information regarding the domestic works legal rights. See Leavitt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc, as it discusses a similar case where the defendant did not accommodate with the plaintiff’s disability.

x

Hi!
I'm Elaine!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out