A the citizens want, and if they

A democracy is any form of government where citizens control their government and who leads it through voting in elections, they’re a lot of different types of democracies but the main ones include direct democracy and representative democracy. A direct democracy also referred to as a pure democracy is when all power is given to the citizens and they have direct participation in the decision-making process. The citizens usually have to be over 18 and they write laws, submit them, vote on them, and there is no difference between the people and the government. A representative democracy is also specified as an indirect democracy or a republic. In this form of government, people elect their leaders who then write and vote on the laws of their society. These leaders are responsible for enforcing the laws the rest of the citizens want, and if they don’t serve people, the citizens will rise against them and elect a new representative. The form of government that would work best in scenarios such as high unemployment and social inequality is a representative democracy because the citizens have the power to elect whom they want to presume office. The people should vote for the one who possesses education and training such as politics. This also means that they have to determine who the best person is to represent them and withstand their beliefs and opinions. Having an educated representative would benefit the economy as the representatives make sure the interests of all sectors of society meaning (the higher, lower, middle classes) are taken into account, also within both scenarios because the main reason the citizens are experiencing social inequality, is due to them being unemployed and all the larger differences of income amidst the rich and poor.  All these cons go under them lacking education hence not knowing the laws and different actions needed to take to stop the social inequality. The citizens knowing that they have a voice in the government through their representative would encourage them, to be more prone to seek education and be up to date with the issues happening around themselves and their society.  This will then lead to them minimizing the unemployment rate because they will be aiming to get economic fairness. The social inequality would be irrelevant and overlooked as there wouldn’t be any superior amongst the citizens and everyone would be employed due to them being educated thus leading to income equality. This form of democracy is preferable to a direct democracy because in a direct democracy it would be harder to reach a consensus because, in a position where all citizens are allowed to voice their opinion, it becomes far more problematic to get to a  final decision. It can lead to people deciding on whose voices to listen to and whose voices are not important. Also, the social inequality would be majorly precarious, it would work in a way where the higher class would be dominating the government and placing rules and probably have them enforced due their power and money. Those rules/laws would most likely not be suitable for everyone because there’s a huge differentiation amongst the economy and not everyone is striving for the same goals or has the same beliefs and their opinions would be neglected. Having a representative can decrease the high unemployment rate because the representative can  encounter the citizens opinions on how they would stop the economic unfairness and maybe oppose that the economy uses more labour intensive technology, all sections of the economy could learn how to adopt labour-intensive technology because then it would create opportunities that can be developed both in rural and urban parts of the economy.Contrary to a direct democracy, a non-democratic form of government that would best for the scenarios listed above which are high unemployment rate and social inequality would be, a monarchy. A monarchy is individuals or a group of people have power by bloodline meaning that kings, queens, princes, princesses, sultans and other titles that refer to a leader whose family possesses the absolute power in the nation. These monarchs have lifetime power and when they die, the power is usually passed to the oldest direct male child of the monarch. Since the main issues in the economy are high unemployment rates and social inequality, with the ruling of a monarchy the high unemployment rates would decrease. A Monarchy has the potentiality of reducing the amounts of expenses spent by the country from elections, so this would benefit the citizens by having the monarchy spend it on things like schools or educational groups. This advantage works best especially for the out because with a good education foundation they have the potential to decrease the unemployment in the future. The educational groups could be for the adults and they would get educated and gain skills needed to get good jobs and better themselves as well the income equality.  This form of government would decrease the social inequality in the economy because there is only one person who makes the decisions and everyone is obligated to obey them. Also, all the social classes have enormous respect for their king or queen meaning no one is distinguished based on their class because in the everyone pays respect to the same person. Having a monarchy government reduces the chances of corruption within the classes to the government. And also since the monarch rulers know that their leadership is for a long term they have no urge desire for money so they wouldn’t abuse their authority for corruption.


I'm Mary!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out