A tiny, lifeless body of 3-year-old, Alan Kurdi, was found on the shore of Turkey in September of 2015. He had been fleeing from a war in Syria with his family but had fallen out of the rubber raft when the boat flipped and sank. As Alan’s dad tried to save him, Alan let out his final words, “Daddy, please don’t die.” Many similar cases like this happen in the Mediterranean Sea when people from Middle East Asia travel over to Europe as refugees due to the ongoing wars in their home country. Although they do not have a promised life in Europe, they still go through the harsh journey to continue their lives. The European Union must continue to accept controlled numbers of refugees on humanitarian grounds, create a larger workforce that provides for future needs, and to earn an economic advantage.Tracing the origins of the refugees will help us understand why they are so desperate to flee out of their country without any guaranteed plans. The top three origins of the highest number of refugees are all located in the Middle East with over 350,000 migrants out of Syria (BBC). These migrants are escaping from the Syrian Civil War, which has resulted in 480,000 casualties and 6.3 million people to be internally displaced (Mercy Corps). The cities located near the war have been completely ruined and the basic necessities such as water and food are scarce. Moreover, the condition of Syria has become worse as the outside parties, such as ISIS, took part in the conflict in the fall of 2015 (Huffington Post). To escape from this chaos and insecurity, people from Middle East Asia are in search of safety near their country. Unfortunately, the Arab Gulf countries which neighbor Syria, are limiting access to the refugees because after the crisis began, the number of refugees was dramatically increasing. As a result, the abandoned members from Middle East Asia did not have any choice but to transfer to Europe. We cannot simply ignore the fact that their country is currently unstable and that sending the refugees back to their country will only lead them to extreme hardship. Reaching out a hand of support by allowing a set number of refugees could save them from facing series of danger that may end their life. Economic migrants, commonly known as migrants seeking an improvement in their life by capturing a job, “make up more than half of all migrants to Europe”, according to the vice-president of the European Commission. Even so, many European countries are considering them as a refugee and forcing them out of the border. As taking part as employees and some even owners of businesses, the refugees could fill up the vacancy in the offices in countries with low employment rates and build a broader workforce for the future. By looking at the demographic trend in Europe from 2001 and 2011, we are able to see that Germany and much of Eastern Europe are losing their population quite rapidly (BBC) and that by 2060, there will be 13 million reductions in the population (The German Statistical office). Correspondingly, the employment rates are declining and companies are incapable of finding sufficient amount of qualified applicants. This problem could be solved when a certain number of well-educated Syrians and Palestinians start working for the companies. Dieter Zetsche, the head of car manufacturer Daimler have mentioned in a newspaper interview, “most refugees are young, well educated and highly motivated. Those are exactly the people we are searching for.” Although refugees will help fill the lack of workers, a diversity in the workforce might be created. Luckily, the refugees have already shown their skills at Turkey, where they contributed 334 million dollars to the country with more than 10,000 Syrian owned business (Center for Global Center). Catching this valuable chance and beginning a search of applicants from the refugee reception center could help the owners refill their company. Out of the many misconceptions people have about the refugees, the most popular one will be as follows: refugees will be another economic burden for the countries since they require the government to support them with an extreme amount of money. Indeed, Johanne Singhammer, the Vice president of Germany stated, “…around 23 billion Euro has been spent on migrants and refugees in 2016”. The withdrawal of the money from the country is great, yet, surprisingly, Germany is one of the fewest countries in Europe to welcome the refugees. Why is this? Contrary to the common beliefs, many studies have shown that migrants and refugees in most countries contribute more in taxes than the amount of money they take in from the government (OECD; UN’s International Labour Organization; University College London). The refugees in the UK during 1995 throughout 2011 have brought around 35 billion Euro worth of education and 5 billion Euro worth of taxes. With the refugee’s responsibility of managing their taxes even in harsh conditions, they were able to prove that they could be an economic benefit for the host country. In fact, the Carlos Vargas-Silva of the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford has predicted that allowing in a controlled number, ranging around 260,000 migrants a year into the UK could cut down the UK’s public debts after 50 years. Consequently, the effect of refugees on the economy is substantial but only a minimal number of countries are catching this opportunity. For this reason, certain amount of refugees must be accepted. The migrant crisis in one of the most tragic issues at this moment. However, the European Union was not able to set a series of regulation to restrain this catastrophe. The European Union must accept a certain number of refugees on humanitarian grounds, to build a stable workforce, and to receive additional economic gains. Causing a shocking number of deaths over the few years, the migration crisis could develop into a worldwide pandemonium, if any kind of solution is not processed immediately.